Who's worse: IOC vs FIFA

I think at this point, this is a valid question.

Quote:

In a non-binding referendum in February, 55.9 percent of Norwegians said they didn't want the Games. "There must be major changes in the IOC before I can help to support an Olympic application," said Tromsø Mayor Jens Johan Hjort. Stoking some of that anger was the IOC's list of demands for an Oslo bid, which included a cocktail reception with Norway's king, with the tab on either the royal family or the Norwegian Olympic Committee. Among the IOC's other demands: Cars and drivers for IOC members, with special dedicated highway lanes Street lights synchronized to prioritize IOC traffic Separate airport entrance for IOC members Hotel mini-bars must have only Coca-Cola products Samsung phones for all IOC members All meeting rooms must be kept at exactly 68 degrees. All furniture must have "Olympic appearance." "IOC members will be received with a smile on arrival at hotel" Oslo joins a decorated list of municipalities that have declined to pursue Olympic bids, or dropped out of the running after residents voted against it. Invariably, each blamed the rising cost and invisible benefits of hosting the Olympics. Among those who withdrew are Krakow, Poland; Stockholm, Sweden; Munich, Germany; Davos/St. Moritz, Switzerland; and Lviv, Ukraine, which dropped out just before the IOC selected three finalists (the only three cities remaining). With Oslo out, it's down to Beijing, China, and Almaty, Kazakhstan. The vote will be held on July 31, 2015, assuming one or both candidate cities don't drop out before then.