Instinct says this is rubbish, but I am interested to know if actually more money may be found for ground improvements if we are relegated. This could be because:
• Parachute payments mean we have three years of premiership money? One further year in the premier league will just mean four years?
• If we stay up TP will wish to spend tens of millions on the squad and wages. I don’t believe Stoke made an operating surplus during his years of tenure (this could be wrong).
• A subsequent relegation would therefore leave expensive contracts, which apparently we are not currently burdened by. Whilst each extra year in the PL may only give rise to an operating loss.
A bigger surplus with relegation may be untrue, but I am interested in people’s feedback on the crazy world of football finances.
• Parachute payments mean we have three years of premiership money? One further year in the premier league will just mean four years?
• If we stay up TP will wish to spend tens of millions on the squad and wages. I don’t believe Stoke made an operating surplus during his years of tenure (this could be wrong).
• A subsequent relegation would therefore leave expensive contracts, which apparently we are not currently burdened by. Whilst each extra year in the PL may only give rise to an operating loss.
A bigger surplus with relegation may be untrue, but I am interested in people’s feedback on the crazy world of football finances.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire